Still not enough taxonomists: reply to Joppa et al.

نویسنده

  • Sven Bacher
چکیده

Taxonomists are people who describe species. This work is essential for the conservation of biodiversity and for estimating how many species there are left to be discovered, the so-called missing species [1]. However, it has been claimed the science of taxonomy is in crisis [2] because researchers are afraid that the number of people describing new species is in decline [3,4]. In a recent letter in TREE, Joppa and coworkers show that, contrary to this common belief, the number of taxonomists actually increased exponentially over the last 60 years with respect to all taxa they investigated (plants, spiders, cone snails, amphibians, birds, mammals) [5]. By contrast, the number of species described per taxonomist has declined since about 1900 in all but one taxon (cone snails), which is indicative of a diminishing pool of missing species. This decline in per-capita rates of description of new species can now be used to estimate the total numbers of species that there are on earth [1,6]. However, because Joppa and colleagues only analysed rather wellstudied taxa, they question if the pattern they found is representative for more poorly known, species-rich groups such as beetles and parasitic wasps [5]. Here I analysed two databases for the two major superfamilies of parasitic wasps [7,8], the Chalcidoidea and the Ichneumonoidea, and found that the number of taxonomists describing species in these two groups has increased roughly exponentially for almost the last 250 years, since the very beginning of parasitic wasp description (Figure 1a). However, in contrast to more well-known taxa, there has been no sign of decline in the number of parasitic wasp species described per taxonomist since at least 1940 (Figure 1b), which indicates that the pool of missing species yet to be discovered is not limiting the rate of description of new species. Thus, in these two speciose but more poorly known groups, it is not possible to use the decline in description rates per taxonomist to make reliable estimates of how many species there are. An exponentially increasing number of taxonomists for almost all taxa seems to suggest that taxonomy is not in crisis. However, even after more than 250 years of taxonomic study the increasing number of taxonomists is not enough to allow estimation of how many species there are still left to be discovered in speciose but less-well studied taxa such as beetles [9] and parasitic wasps, two groups that comprise a major fraction of all the species on earth [10]. It is commonly agreed that at current rates of extinction, many species will die out before they are described by science [3,11]. This is tragic in itself, but it also means that with the current gap in our knowledge of how many species

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

More taxonomists describing significantly fewer species per unit effort may indicate that most species have been discovered.

Recent studies show that there are more taxonomists describing species in recent decades than before. However, whether the rate of increase in number of taxonomists is greater than the rate of new species description has been questioned.We found a statistically significant decline in the proportion of species being described per number of taxonomists (i.e., authors of recent species description...

متن کامل

Fusarium Head Blight Reaction of Langdon Durum-Triticum dicoccoides Chromosome Substitution Lines

since the early 1980s (McMullen et al., 1997; Wilcoxson et al., 1988; Windels, 2000). Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium graminearum Management practices such as crop rotation have Schwabe, is a serious disease problem on durum wheat (Triticum been ineffective in limiting the disease. Most researchers turgidum L. var. durum ) in the USA. To date, the resistance to FHB available in h...

متن کامل

Environmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)

Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...

متن کامل

A reply to Páll-Gergely's suggestions to improve the taxonomy index (T-Index) introduced by Valdecasas (2011) .

In a letter to Nature, Valdecasas et al. (2000) criticised the Impact Factor (IF) which calculates the number of citations in scientific publications, particularly within biodiversity studies. Subsequently, even though Krell (2000, 2002) claimed that IF was not relevant to taxonomy, however, IF has continued to play and increasingly important role in evaluations of scientists, taxonomists not e...

متن کامل

The search for unknown biodiversity.

I n a world being rapidly transformed by human activities, an alarming possibility is that many species might disappear before we have a chance to study or even scientifically describe them. This possibility goes beyond a simple desire to document biodiversity, because unknown species could have important benefits for humanity. For instance, who might have imagined that an obscure herb endemic ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Trends in ecology & evolution

دوره 27 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012